Methods

The Public Health Environmental Surveillance Evaluation Framework (PHES-EF) will be developed in five steps.

Study Steps

Establish the Executive Group
Establish the Executiv...
Generate candidate
evaluation items
Generate candidate...
Perform the international
e-Delphi survey
Perform the internatio...
Conduct the consensus meeting
Conduct the consensus...
Disseminate the evaluation framework
Disseminate the evalua...
  • Agree on the scope of the study and develop study protocol.
  • Agree on Terms of Reference for executive group members.
Agree on the scope of the study and develop study protocol.Agree...
  • Conduct scoping reviews to extract relevant items for e-Delphi.
  • Review candidate items with the Executive Group to establish the organization, completeness, and redundancy of the candidate items list.
Conduct scoping reviews to extract relevant items for e-Delphi.R...
  • Recruit, screen, and register international participants for participation in e-Delphi survey.
  • Conduct recruitment and retention efforts during each round.
Recruit, screen, and register international participants for part...
  • Obtain expert consensus on the final list of items for PHES-EF.
  • Determine dissemination strategies for the evaluation framework.
Obtain expert consensus on the final list of items for PHES-EF.De...
  • Make the framework available to all stakeholder groups and publish it in an open-access journal with an open license.
  • Engage with researchers and promote the adoption of the evaluation framework.
Make the framework available to all stakeholder groups and publis...
STEP 1
STEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 2
STEP 3
STEP 3
STEP 5
STEP 5
STEP 4
STEP 4
Text is not SVG - cannot display

Figure 1. Overview of the development process for the Public Health Environmental Surveillance Evaluation Framework (PHES-EF)

Step 1: Establishment of the Executive Group

A multinational and multidisciplinary executive group of 12 members will oversee the development of the evaluation framework. The group will bring expertise from the following fields: mathematical sciences, social sciences, environmental and physical sciences, public health and medicine, and public interest/knowledge users.

The executive group will be responsible for providing feedback on the framework development process, connecting the study to other related projects, recruiting electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) panellists, participating in the consensus meeting, disseminating the evaluation framework, advising and/or participating in post-publication activities, and promoting the adoption of the evaluation framework among their professional networks.

You can learn more about the study executive group members here.

Step 2: Generation of Candidate Items

We will conduct relevant scoping review(s) and consult the study’s expert executive group to generate a list of PHES-EF e-Delphi candidate items.

Relevant scoping review registrations and publications can be accessed here.

Step 3: International e-Delphi Survey

We will use an e-Delphi technique to develop an internationally accepted evaluation framework for public health environmental surveillance. The Delphi method is an iterative multi-round approach that uses a series of sequential surveys, interspersed by controlled feedback, to elicit consensus among a group of individuals while maintaining anonymity (2). We will use the e-Delphi method to overcome geographic barriers and allow us to engage panellists internationally across various time zones.

For more details, see the e-Delphi page.

Step 4: Consensus Meeting

In preparation for the consensus meeting, the study working group will categorize candidate items for consideration into a preliminary evaluation framework. This will include merging and/or modifying items based on feedback gathered from the e-Delphi rounds.

An in-person or hybrid consensus meeting will be held after the results of the e-Delphi have been compiled and analysed. The primary objective will be to achieve expert consensus on the final list of items for PHES-EF, through review and discussion of salient items. This process will be guided by the empirical evidence that was identified during the scoping review(s), and the opinions gathered during the e-Delphi process.

Steps to produce the final list of items are as follows: (i) present the results of e-Delphi exercise (name, rationale, and score of each item); (ii) discuss the rationale and relevance for including the items in the framework; and (iii) vote on equivocal and non-consensual items. PHES-EF will be developed based on the final list of items that receive consensus during the executive group consensus meeting.

Step 5: Dissemination of Evaluation Framework

The development of the evaluation framework will be reported in a statement document that will include the rationale and a brief description of the meeting and the panellists involved. The evaluation framework will be made available as a preprint, prior to publication in an open-access peer-reviewed journal. PHES-EF will be made available using an open license (CC-BY-SA-4.0 license).

References

1.
Tricco ACT, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine [Internet]. 2018 Oct 2;169(7). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
2.
Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World Journal of Methodology [Internet]. 2021 Jul 20;11(4). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116